Oil N Gold: Crude Oil and Gold Weekly Technical Outlook

Here is your weekend Technical outlook for crude oil and gold from the traders at Oil N Gold. Com......



Crude Oil
Crude oil's corrective rise from 75.71 extended further last week but struggled to take out 55 days EMA. Also strong resistance around 90 psychological level. While such correction might extend, current development suggests that it should be to completion and rise attempts should be limited by near term falling trend line resistance (now at 92.3). A break of 85.00 minor support will be the first signal of resumption of fall from 114.83 and should turn bias to the downside for retesting 75.71 low first.

In the bigger picture, medium term rebound from 33.2 is treated as the second leg of consolidation pattern from 147.24 and should have finished at 114.83 already. Current decline should target next key cluster support at 64.23 (61.8% retracement of 33.2 to 114.83 at 64.38) next. Sustained break will pave the way to retest 33.2 low. However, break of 100.62 resistance will indicate that fall from 114.83 has completed after meeting missing 100% projection target. The corrective structure of such decline in turn argues that rise from 33.2 is still in progress for another high above 114.83.

In the long term picture, crude oil is in a long term consolidation pattern from 147.27, with first wave completed at 33.2, second wave might be finished. Upon confirmation of medium term reversal, the third wave of the pattern should have started for a retest on 33.2 low.

Gold
Gold's choppy fall from 1923.7 extended to as low as 1765.4 last week and there is no sign of completion yet. Such decline is either consolidation to rise from 1705.4 or the third leg of the consolidation pattern from 1917.9. In either case, more choppy trading would still be seen in range of 1705.4/1923.7. But in case of deeper fall, we'd expect strong support above 1705.4 to contain downside and bring up trend resumption. Above 1923.7 should in turn send gold towards 61.8% projection of 1478.3 to 1917.9 from 1705.4 at 1977.1.

In the bigger picture, firstly, gold's long term up trend is still intact and there is no signal of reversal yet. Another record high should still be seen. But we'll be cautious on another near term reversal near to 2000 psychological level and finally bring some lengthier consolidation. Meanwhile, a break of 1705.4 will argue that gold has indeed topped out with a double top reversal pattern (1917.9, 1923.7) and in such case, deeper pull back could be seen back towards resistance turned 1577.4 support instead.

In the long term picture, rise from 681 is treated as resumption of the long term up trend from 1999 low of 253 and there is no sign of topping yet. Current up trend could now be targeting 161.8% projection of 253 to 1033.9 from 681 at 1945.6. Sustained trading above 2000 psychological level should pave the way to 261.8% projection at 2727.2.

The Battle Continues Between the Bulls and the Bears

The battle between the Bulls and Bears continues in the equity markets. This past week the Bulls won with a very positive 5.35% return.

Out of the 6 markets that we track, only two closed with a positive gain for the week and they were the S&P 500 index and crude oil. We consider both of these moves counter trend rally’s. Both the silver and gold markets lost ground last week, with silver closing down 1.89% and gold dropping 2.36%.

The Dollar Index saw some profit taking and closed down .85% for the week.
The Reuters/Jefferies CRB Commodity Index also came under pressure and closed down 1.38% in line with the general trend.

Let’s go take a look at the markets and see how we can preserve and protect and grow your capital in 2011.

S&P 500 Change for the week: + 5.35%
Monthly Trade Triangles for Long Term Trends: = Negative
Weekly Trade Triangles for Intermediate Term Trends: = Positive
Daily Trade Triangles for Short Term Trends: = Positive
Combined Strength of Trend Score: = + 70

Silver Change for the week: – 1.89%
Monthly Trade Triangles for Long Term Trends: = Positive
Weekly Trade Triangles for Intermediate Term Trends: = Positive
Daily Trade Triangles for Short Term Trends: = Negative
Combined Strength of Trend Score: = + 65

Gold Change for the week: – 2.36%
Monthly Trade Triangles for Long Term Trends: = Positive
Weekly Trade Triangles for Intermediate Term Trends: = Positive
Daily Trade Triangles for Short Term Trends: = Negative
Combined Strength of Trend Score: = + 65

Crude Oil Change for the week: + .91%
Monthly Trade Triangles for Long Term Trends: = Negative
Weekly Trade Triangles for Intermediate Term Trends: = Positive
Daily Trade Triangles for Short Term Trends: = Negative
Combined Strength of Trend Score: = + 55

Dollar Index Change for the week: – .85%
Monthly Trade Triangles for Long Term Trends: = Positive
Weekly Trade Triangles for Intermediate Term Trends: = Positive
Daily Trade Triangles for Short Term Trends: = Negative
Combined Strength of Trend Score: = + 75

CRB Index Change for the week: – 1.38%
Monthly Trade Triangles for Long Term Trends: = Negative
Weekly Trade Triangles for Intermediate Term Trends: = Positive
Daily Trade Triangles for Short Term Trends: = Negative
Combined Strength of Trend Score: = – 75

Don't miss our weekend video update.......

Unlimited access to this and other trading videos FREE! Click Here!

Brent Crude Dips After Platts Changes Formula

US benchmark crude contracts fell on concerns that the economic recovery in the US is slowing, while Brent crude was on the rise in London as the outlook for the European debt crisis brightened. However, the trends changed late in the week as Brent fell after Platts decided to change the way it calculates the benchmark price. Oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) were hit by a slew of downbeat US data that came out late in the week. Thursday’s employment report from the US Labor Department revealed s surprise increase in US jobless claims to 428,000 last week.

Manufacturing data that was released on the same day also disappointed, showing a decline in the Empire State index from minus-7.7 in August to minus-8.8 in September, while the Philly Fed rose 13.2 to minus-17.5 in September, but still missed expectations. In the meantime, Brent contracts were on the rise, enjoying support from reassuring statements from European politicians that Greece will not quit the euro zone and the EU will go as far as necessary to prevent it from going into a default.

Demand for Brent was also supported by lingering concerns over supplies from the North Sea following a series of delays over the past few weeks. However, Brent futures fell sharply late on Friday after Platts, the energy information arm of McGraw Hill, said it will change the Brent crude pricing formula sooner than expected. The changes to the benchmark that is used to price two third of the world’s oil will come into effect in January 2012 instead of the first quarter of 2013 as was planned before.

Platts has decided to change the pricing benchmark due to a reduction in Brent crude supplies in recent years, which has made it easier for traders to manipulate the market. The Brent crude prices will now be assessed based on contracts signed over a 16 day period instead of the previous 12 day span. “Recent events in the market, including disruptions to the Forties pipeline system and shortfalls in cargo deliveries, show clearly that timely action is needed to maintain the strength of the physical benchmark,” said vice president of editorial at Platts Dan Tanz.


Posted courtesy of Pro Active Investors

Zacks: Kinder Morgan-Valero Pipeline Pact

Leading petroleum product pipeline owner and operator Kinder Morgan Energy Partners L.P (KMP) has partnered with San Antonio based Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) to build a new 136 mile, 16 inch pipeline to transport gasoline, jet fuel and diesel. Known as Parkway Pipeline LLC, the proposed initiative is estimated to cost $220 million.

While both companies will own the pipeline system, Kinder Morgan will be the operator. Parkway Pipeline is expected to have an initial capacity of 110,000 barrels per day that can be eventually expanded to over 200,000 bpd.

The refined products would be shipped from refineries in Norco, Louisiana to the Collins, Mississippi hub, owned by a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Plantation Pipe Line Company. Kinder Morgan has a 51% stake in the petroleum transportation hub of which it is also the operator. Thereafter, the refined petroleum products will be distributed by the pipeline systems, including Plantation, to important markets in the southeastern United States from this hub.

The pipeline is expected to begin operations by mid 2013 after getting approvals from the concerned environmental and regulatory authorities. It is expected to be accretive for Kinder Morgan unitholders upon completion as the project has a long-term backing of a credit worthy shipper.

To curtail environmental impacts, Parkway Pipeline construction will follow prevailing utility rights of way wherever possible. The project is expected to boost fuel supply, and at the same time offer all shippers larger access to Gulf Coast refineries.

Kinder Morgan’s continuous effort to upgrade its portfolio is evident from its newest business segment, Trans Mountain Pipeline (now under Kinder Morgan Canada), an approximately 715 mile transport system overbooked by a wide margin for September. Trans Mountain has a pipeline capacity of approximately 300,000 barrels per day.

P{osted courtesy of Zacks on Seeking Alpha. Kinder Morgan holds a Zacks #3 Rank, which is equivalent to a Hold rating for a period of one to three months. For the long term, we maintain a Neutral rating on the stock.

Phil Flynn: Prime The Pump And Bailout The Brent

Oh sure, now you go and bail out Europe and drive the Brent Crude versus West Texas Intermediate spread back above $25 wide! Brent crude gets pumped up as global central bank pumps dollar liquidity in to European banks. The reduced risk of bank default and kicking the Greece default can further down the road had the Brent crude supply demand fundamentals tightened in a minute.

The decision of the five largest central banks to dump dollars into European banks added to the support for oil but created fears of a tightness of supply in the Brent. Weak production from the North Sea and conflicting reports on the return of Libyan crude seems to be adding to the Brent woes. There is some short term confidence coming out of the Euro zone and this will increase demand or at least expectations of demand almost instantly.


The spread between Brent crude and West Texas had previously come in, especially after U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excluding those in the Strategic Petroleum reserve) fell by 6.7 million barrels which put US supply at 346.4 million barrels which is still well above the five year average.


Robert Campbell of Reuters News says writes, "Looking back at the impact of the Libyan civil war on the oil market the most remarkable fact is that the situation did not lead to an oil super-spike. After all, a scramble for sweet crude in 2007 is widely seen as the trigger for the spiral in oil prices until they hit nearly $150 a barrel. Although the data are still coming in, it would appear that the Atlantic basin refining sector is now more flexible, in part due to weaker demand and in part due to investments in new capacity. Sweet refiners may be suffering because of high crude costs, but the system as a whole is not breaking down."

He goes on to say, "The resilience of the market is all the more impressive once the other supply disruptions to the European short haul sweet crude market are considered. Normal decline of the aging fields in the North Sea is well known, as is the extraordinary sequence of problems at several important production facilities in the area. Less discussed is the reduction in crude oil production in Azerbaijan, an important supplier of very low sulfur crude.

Combined with the conflict in Libya a huge amount of sweet crude oil production was lost to European refiners, many of which rely on short haul cargoes. In the first half of the year sweet crude output from Azerbaijan, Britain, Libya and Norway was 215 million barrels less than in 2010. With this number in mind, the response of the International Energy Agency to the crisis.....a release of 60 million barrels of strategic stocks, seems almost timid. Doubtless, the IEA would argue that the problems in Azerbaijan, Britain and Norway were not the classic supply disruptions the agency is meant to guard against."


Posted courtesy of Phil Flynn and PFGs Best. You can contact Phil at 800-935-6487 or email him at pflynn@pfgbest.com. Get the "Power to Prosper" by tuning into the Fox Business Network where you can see Phil every day!

Crude Oil Pressured By Euro Weakness and Greek Bailout Doubts

Crude oil was slightly lower in overnight trading as the euro has stalled in it's advance against the dollar on worries that an agreement to bail out Greece may be held up by a number of countries. Stochastics and RSI ifor WTI oil remain overbought. If November extends the rebound off August's low, the May-July downtrend line crossing near 92.13 is the next upside target.

Closes below Monday's low crossing at 85.17 would confirm that the corrective rally off August's low has ended while opening the door for a possible test of August's low crossing at 76.61 later this fall.

First resistance is Tuesday's high crossing at 90.60. Second resistance is the May-July downtrend line crossing near 92.13. First support is Monday's low crossing at 85.17. Second support is last Tuesday's low crossing at 83.47. Crude oil pivot point for Friday morning is 89.19.

EIA: Key Factors Affecting the Outlook for Restoring Libya's Oil Production

As the fighting in Libya begins to wind down and the Transitional National Council (TNC) establishes itself as the internationally recognized government, it is timely to review the many factors that will affect the pace and timing of the restart of the Libyan oil industry.

The TNC leadership, which views oil revenues as a means to rebuilding the country, and participants in world oil markets, who continue to grapple with tightness in the global supply of high quality crude, share a common interest in restoring Libya's oil production and exports. When this will happen is uncertain and depends to a significant extent on the political, military, and security situation that will determine when companies can return to oil fields to repair and/or restart production. It is also worth noting that at the time of writing, only the European Union and United Nations had lifted sanctions on Libya; U.S. sanctions remain in place.

Opinions vary across analysts. Some predict a slow and protracted recovery, while others are more optimistic, pointing to TNC statements on its commitment to restarting oil production. Most international oil companies (IOCs) have been cautious regarding their public statements on resuming production.

Political and military outcomes will each play an important role in creating conditions that speed or retard production activity. Politically, there must be sufficient legitimacy and legal clarity to allow for financing activity and exchanges of funds. A recognized government with the institutions in place to uphold contracts and manage revenues will be necessary for the IOCs to return. While the TNC has stated that it will respect existing contracts, IOCs seeking to purchase oil from Libya or invest in the country's oil sector must be able to identify their institutional and financial counterparts within the new regime.

One question to be addressed is whether oil revenues should be paid to the national oil company, to the oil ministry, or to other parties. Another option might be to allocate funds to an escrow account pending clarification of future arrangements so that operations can resume. IOCs also need to consider that the government and its institutions are likely to continue to evolve over time.

Militarily, remnants of the conflict may also continue to present challenges. As of this writing, Gaddafi loyalists are still in control of a few areas of the country and some analysts believe that pockets of resistance will remain even after the fighting has come to an end. Beyond the military conflict, security concerns could delay the return of oil workers and the resumption of production. While the oil industry is not very labor-intensive, a large part of the labor employed in the sector is highly specialized, and, in many cases, comprises expatriates who are likely to have found employment elsewhere. The conflict also scattered the Libyan workforce. It will take time to reassemble the staff, and even then there is a risk that the aftermath of the conflict could affect workforce morale and cohesion as employees face up to their differing roles and loyalties before and during the fighting.

Some of the security concerns are directly tied to the oil infrastructure (Figure 1). For instance, Gulf of Sirte, an area that accounts for about two thirds of Libyan oil production, saw the heaviest fighting and the most damage and is likely to face continuing security concerns. In terms of security, press reports suggest that the oil terminals and surrounding infrastructure of Ras Lanuf and Brega have been booby trapped with explosive devices.

Figure 1

The Financial Times cited land mine experts as saying it could take 18 months to clear some of the explosives, an issue that will need to be addressed before the known damage can be fully repaired. Resuming production will bring with it its own security concerns as the infrastructure is a relatively easy target. During the conflict, oil production out of the east was sporadic at times because when production resumed, it became a target for loyalist forces.

Read the entire article at www.eia.gov

Crude Oil Market Continues to Tease Us With It's Sideways Action

The crude oil market continues to tease us with its sideways action. While this market has been trending to the upside, we want to pay particular attention to the uptrend line from August 9th through today. We do not think that the crude oil market is ready to go higher based on our long term monthly Trade Triangle, which continues to be negative for this market.

The $90 a barrel resistance continues, as the market has had a difficult time moving over that area and maintaining a positive close above that zone. Look for crude oil to continue to move in a sideways to lower manner.

Crude oil closed higher on Thursday and remains poised to extend the rally off August's low. The high range close sets the stage for a steady to higher opening on Friday. Stochastics and the RSI are overbought, diverging but are neutral to bullish signaling that sideways to higher prices are still possible near term.

Closes above the May-July downtrend line crossing near 92.64 would confirm an end to this summer's decline. Closes below Monday's low crossing at 85.17 would confirm an end to the corrective rally off August's low.

First resistance is Tuesday's high crossing at 90.60. Second resistance is the May-July downtrend line crossing near 92.64. First support is Monday's low crossing at 85.17. Second support is the reaction low crossing at 83.47.

Monthly Trade Triangles for Long Term Trends = Negative
Weekly Trade Triangles for Intermediate Term Trends = Positive
Daily Trade Triangles for Short Term Trends = Positive
Combined Strength of Trend Score = + 70

Get My Free Weekly Index & Commodity Forecast

Phil Flynn: The Worst Is Over?

Is it possible that the worst is over? Despite the separation anxiety in the Euro Zone and a rouge trade that took away UBS profits, many markets are signaling that they believe that at least for now, all the bad news is out. Or maybe that things can't get any worse. It looks like the plunging euro currency, the British Pound and the Swiss franc, is turning the corner as well as crude oil, a market by the way that we have called that the low is in for the year. Stocks seem to have found a bottom and their lows look like they might be in as well. Do we deserve all this optimism? It seems that support from German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicholas Sarkozy, is making the markets think there may be a master plan to save the Euro zone and the global economy as well.

Is the market right ? Do we deserve a bottom? Well whether we deserve it or not the indicators from the technical side seem to be in alignment. Oil is gaining confidence and we are seeing signs that products are bottoming. Besides, the market is rebounding from sharply lower expectations from the likes of many of the major agencies like OPEC, the Energy Information Agency as well as the International Energy Agency. Besides lowering demand, the other key for the direction of oil may be when Libya's oil comes back to the market. The International Energy Agency says that, "As the fighting in Libya begins to wind down and the Transitional National Council (TNC) establishes itself as the internationally recognized government, it is timely to review the many factors that will affect the pace and timing of the restart of the Libyan oil industry.

The TNC leadership, which views oil revenues as a means to rebuilding the country, and participants in world oil markets, who continue to grapple with tightness in the global supply of high quality crude, share a common interest in restoring Libya's oil production and exports. When this will happen is uncertain and depends to a significant extent on the political, military, and security situation that will determine when companies can return to oil fields to repair and/or restart production. It is also worth noting that at the time of writing, only the European Union and United Nations had lifted sanctions on Libya; U.S. sanctions remain in place"......Read the entire article.

Marcellus Committee Clears Permit Fee Hurdle in West Virginia

Natural gas operators would pay $10,000 to drill a well in West Virginia's share of the Marcellus shale field, and $5,000 for each additional well at the initial site, under a proposal adopted Wednesday by a special legislative committee.

The House-Senate panel also approved provisions increasing bonds posted for well projects, enhancing public notice of drilling and compensating the owners of surface land where operators drill their wells. With the committee resuming its work next month, Wednesday's changes move lawmakers closer to a regulatory bill that they hope to propose during a special session before year's end.

But the permit fee amendment has been considered a crucial hurdle in the process. Operators now pay just a few hundred dollars for a permit. The resulting revenues have helped to leave the Department of Environmental Protection's Oil and Gas office with a $1 million shortfall in its budget.....Read the entire AP article.