The gold market continues to frustrate the bulls and confound conventional wisdom. The market action yesterday and early today can only be seen as negative. With both our weekly and monthly Trade Triangles red, we see no reason to get excited about gold moving higher at the moment, so for now say goodbye to yellow gold.
On the other side of the ledger, say hello to black gold. Yesterday our weekly green Trade Triangle kicked in and gave a buy signal in the crude oil market. Yesterday's buy signal was in line with the longer term monthly Trade Triangle, which has been bullish and in place for quite some time. We see the renewed bull market in crude oil continuing from here based on our Trade Triangle technology. With gasoline and crude oil prices moving higher, it does raise concerns about gas prices. If gas prices become so expensive, is that going to derail the economy?
The 2 Energy Sectors You Should Invest in This Year
Trade ideas, analysis and low risk set ups for commodities, Bitcoin, gold, silver, coffee, the indexes, options and your retirement. We'll help you keep your emotions out of your trading.
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Say Goodbye to Yellow Gold and Hello to Black Gold
Labels:
Crude Oil,
energy,
Gas,
gold,
trade triangle
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
The 2 Energy Sectors You Should Invest in This Year
Top energy analyst Marin Katusa, frequently featured in the financial media such as Forbes, Business News, Financial Sense News Hour, and the Al Korelin Show, says two highly undervalued energy sectors will provide windfalls for smart investors this year.
Read his assessment, including which two energy sectors you should be bullish on for 2013....and which two you'd only lose money on. Click here for Marin's free report, The 2013 Energy Forecast.
Read "Fortune Favors the Bold Energy Investor"
Read his assessment, including which two energy sectors you should be bullish on for 2013....and which two you'd only lose money on. Click here for Marin's free report, The 2013 Energy Forecast.
Read "Fortune Favors the Bold Energy Investor"
Labels:
Al Korelin,
business,
energy,
financial,
Marin Katusa,
reports
What Does 8% Inflation Really Mean?
From Dennis Miller at Casey Research......
Eight percent is not good news. In my latest article I shared some reader feedback from our inflation survey, and in case you missed it, the Money Forever Reader Poll Inflation Rate is 8%. But what does that number really mean for us – seniors and savers trying to protect our buying power? It's time to read the tea leaves and find out.
Up to Your Ass in Alligators
You may remember the old poster that read, "When you are up to your ass in alligators, it's tough to remember the goal was to drain the swamp." You may have felt overwhelmed during the last few years, as the investment options for your retirement portfolio changed. You might read about the benefits of gold and silver one day, then CDs, dividend-paying stocks, and annuities the next. It's pretty easy to feel overwhelmed, particularly when you cannot afford to put too much of your life savings at risk.
One of our readers really drove home the challenges we all face:
"Anyone who has been living on SS [Social Security] checks since 2000 will tell you the same thing. They cannot live on those checks alone, and [have] depended on the interest they receive from their savings accounts or CDs. They cannot do this any longer. They now need to withdraw principal or redeem some CDs just to make ends meet. … [We are] on fixed incomes with no hope of getting a raise. These people understand the effects of inflation more than any other group. These people live with fear every day, understanding they have little control over their financial future, while watching their life savings slowly vanish every year."
My dear friend Toots, whom I often quote, wrote, "Did we prove once again the world is not flat?" Perhaps, but there's more to it. Certainly, I've made that point before, but that doesn't negate the need to highlight these phony government numbers. We shouldn't accept falsehoods with a nod and a wink; that's how they become immutable "facts" of life in many people's minds.
Some folks want to debate the methodology used by Shadow Government Statistics, but that misses the point. The bottom line is: 98.4% of us agree that the real inflation rate is higher than the rate reported by the BLS. That is the reality of our readers – at the grocery store, the gas pump, and today at the flower shop (gentlemen, don't forget roses for your sweetheart). Anyone living on a fixed income already knows this.
The real issue is that we are getting squeezed! At least, 98.4% of us think so. There's no need to dwell on whether it's 6%, 7% or 8%, etc. What really matters is how this affects your life. If the price of my favorite snack doubled, and the price of broccoli dropped 50%, my costs are rising. The price of broccoli could drop 99%, and I still wouldn't buy it.
While planning for retirement, most of us planned for a 2% inflation rate and anticipated earning 6% on our portfolio. That was a nice retirement plan while it lasted, but it won't do much good for anyone now.
Another old-line "rule" was: a retiree could safely use 4% of his portfolio every year to supplement Social Security, and still be fine for the rest of his life. Where did the math come from? If your portfolio grew 6% every year and you took out 4%, the remaining 2% covered any loss to inflation. It was really that simple, and it worked just fine for me in my early retirement years.
We have all heard the old rule, "Live off the interest and never touch the principal." That is exactly what we were doing, while also protecting that principal from inflation.
Now comes the scary part. If the real rate of inflation is anywhere near the Money Forever Reader Poll Inflation Rate of 8%, how much can we take out of our portfolio every year without losing buying power? The math is still simple, but with a frightening answer: nothing, unless you earn more than 8%.
The problem is easy to understand, but the solution is tough to implement. If we want that same 4% to supplement our Social Security checks, we need to earn 12% on our portfolio every year – 8% for inflation and 4% for income. And this does not even factor in taxes. Those of us with a traditional IRA who are over 70 1/2 years old are required to take a minimum distribution, which can come with a nice tax bill.
Imagine that you have a $1 million portfolio, and your goal is to keep up with the Money Forever Reader Poll Inflation Rate and earn 4% income to supplement your Social Security checks. That's $120,000. To maintain a somewhat conservative posture, we recommend 30-33% of your portfolio be in cash, which pays little if any interest; let's assume cash pays 0% for the moment. That means you must earn 17.1% on the remaining $700,000 to reach your goal of $120,000.
That return can come in the form of an income check, dividends, and stock appreciation. Whatever the source, that's a pretty tall order. And it's particularly daunting when you consider that anyone close to retirement age should make minimal high-risk investments. We can't bet it all on a speculative stock, hoping to catch the next Internet startup success story.
Finding the Strength to Strangle the Nemean Lion
The Money Forever team is on the lookout for solid companies that not only pay dividends, but also have a history of regular dividend increases. In the last quarter, three of the stocks in the Money Forever portfolio increased their dividends. It is highly unlikely that most of us will live long enough to see our dividends equal 50% of our investment (which is what Warren Buffett receives from Coca-Cola, according to what I've read). However, if a company is currently paying 4%, it won't take too long to see an 8% yield. Once our dividend yield is at or above the inflation rate, we can factor in appreciation and start gaining ground on the inflation monster once again.
While dividend-paying stocks will get us on the right track, there's still more work ahead. Dividends alone are not enough; we also need stock appreciation. If you subscribe to our premium publications, it may be a good time to review our special report, Money Every Month, where we discuss this in great detail. As of today, over half of the stocks in our portfolio have double-digit gains. While we are proud of what we have accomplished to date, we also understand that the current market could change any minute. We have to remain vigilant. Stocks with a long history of increasing their dividends plus a good history of appreciation are hot tickets. Perhaps this is part of the reason why the stock market is doing so well in a tough economy.
Alternative sources of income can also help. Two of our recent Money Forever premium issues focused on annuities and reverse mortgages. Under the right circumstances, as we outline in our reports, these can be valuable alternatives for filling your cash-flow gap. Nevertheless, please consider all of the risks and cautionary tales included in our reports before purchasing an annuity or signing a reverse mortgage. One seemingly simple mistake – like neglecting to put your spouse on a reverse mortgage – can be devastating.
So can it be done? Can we really build a portfolio that will stand up against the current rate of inflation? Sure; but we have to stay on top of our investments and continue to educate ourselves. "Set it and forget it" won't work.
From the Stadium to the Golf Course
For many of us, cutting back on expenses is very difficult. It can feel like part of our retirement dream is going up in smoke. We have friends who planned to take summer and winter cruises every year after they retired. They thought they had the money to do it, but now they have to cut back. They do not enjoy their driving trip to the local state park nearly as much as they do a cruise.
One of the respondents to our survey mentioned that he cut back on golf from three days to two days a week. Our good friend Phil addressed his golf situation in a unique manner. For several years he had volunteered during spring training for a major league baseball team. Then the local golf course advertised for part-time help. He inquired; the job sounded like fun, and he negotiated complimentary greens fees as part of his package. For him it is the best of both worlds. Now he has a little extra income, his golf expenses are radically reduced, and he still is able to golf regularly, something he really enjoys. And yes, the baseball team is going to have to recruit another free laborer. Somehow, I think they'll manage!
I'm realizing we all have to come to grips with the reality described by our reader at the beginning of today's article. While it may be difficult for all of us, we are old enough to know that putting things off only makes problems get worse faster. It's like our own personal fiscal cliff, but we can't keep running the printing press and ignoring the real problem.
My oldest daughter, also a baby boomer, went to a class on personal financial management about ten years ago. I asked her what she thought the biggest lesson was. Her response surprised me:
"The first thing to deal with is your expectations. If you want a lot of stuff, and currently do not have the income to pay for it, you must find ways to increase your income. If that is not possible, then you must learn to adjust your lifestyle and be happy with what you have, living within your means. Dad, they stressed that part of being truly happy is the realization that your neighbor may have more or less than you do and it makes no difference. Personal financial management is as much an adjustment of your attitude as it is an adjustment of your spending habits."
OK, you get the point, but you may not like it. Neither do I, and neither do the millions of our peers in the same predicament. So what should we do? To start with, everything I just mentioned, which is quite a task. Become an active investor, learn, and adjust to the new market. We must protect our nest eggs and look for solid income opportunities. We must look at our spending habits and see where we can cut back. Every dollar we save takes a little pressure off our portfolio and the need for it to produce income.
Also, don't discount finding other sources of income. Write the book you've been dreaming about – turn your hobbies into a profit. I have a buddy who worked in the auto industry. Dealers often sell a car they do not have in inventory if there is one at a nearby dealer they can trade for. He set up a business helping dealers move vehicles around. He loves it because he stays active, and he says he had to learn zero new skills. His comment was, "Where else can I get a part-time job where I get paid to drive around listening to a ball game?"
You, dear readers, drove home the point for me with your feedback to our survey. If we need 12% or so to protect our nest eggs, then we all have to accept that challenge. If we have a really good year, we can grow our nest eggs and increase our buying power. If we fall short, we must keep erosion to a minimum.
The last time I ran a retirement planning computer program, it said I would be fine as long as I passed away before age 125. In a bad year that may slip to 115. We are all in this together, and I'm committed to making sure Miller's Money Forever lives up to its name.
One final thought…
My overriding point is that we have to take control of our retirement finances. Like I said earlier, the days of "set it and forget it" are gone. The upside here is that we can actually secure our retirement. Together with thousands of subscribers we're doing just that. One way to start is with our free Money Every Month plan outlining how to invest so you’re getting income every month. Click here to find out more about this plan.
The 2 Energy Sectors You Should Invest in This Year
Labels:
casey research,
energy,
feedback,
finances,
inflation,
money,
sector,
shadow government
Where is all the new Natural Gas Pipeline Construction?
U.S. natural gas pipeline capacity investment slowed in 2012 after several years of robust growth. Limited capacity additions were concentrated in the northeast United States, mainly focused on removing bottlenecks for fast growing Marcellus shale gas production. More than half of new pipeline projects that entered commercial service in 2012 were in the Northeast (see map below). Excluding gathering, storage, and distribution lines, project sponsors in the United States added 4.5 billion cubic feet per day of new pipeline capacity and 367 miles of pipe totaling $1.8 billion in capital expenditures in 2012.
Read the entire EIA article
Today's Top Performing ETF's
Read the entire EIA article
Today's Top Performing ETF's
Labels:
EIA,
Marcellus,
Natural Gas,
shale
Monday, March 25, 2013
Tax Treatment of PFGBest Losses
Our friends at DeCarley Trading are reminding Ex-PFG clients to be sure to properly claim the fraudulent losses on your tax return......
Many of you have been asking about the tax treatment of losses sustained at the hands of PFGBEST. Please see below statement from the CCC:
The IRS has confirmed that victims of the PFGBest fraud can access the optional safe harbor mechanism set forth in Revenue Procedure 2009-20 so that victims can claim their losses as theft losses. Responding to the CCC’s request for guidance, the IRS stated in a letter:
…the PFGBest scheme qualifies as a “specified fraudulent arrangement” within the meaning of Revenue Procedure 2009-20. Thus, investors who otherwise meet the requirements of Revenue Procedure 2009-20 may use the safe harbor, following the procedures as set forth in that revenue procedure.
The full response is posted below, along with the documents necessary to utilize this mechanism. Please note: it is not required that PFGBest victims use this procedure. It may not provide the best solution for your particular tax situation. Claimants in the PFGBest case are urged to consult their tax professionals as soon as practicable to determine if it is appropriate and wise to seek relief under the safe harbor deduction for theft losses. You may need to provide the following documents to your tax advisor:
IRS Response to CCC
Revenue Ruling 2009-09: PDF Version
Revenue Procedure 2009-20:PDF Version
CCC Request to IRS CCC Request to IRS
Wasendorf Plea Agreement Wassendorf Plea Agreement
Wassendorf Judgement Wassendorf Judgement
Get our Free Trading Videos, Lessons and eBook today!
Many of you have been asking about the tax treatment of losses sustained at the hands of PFGBEST. Please see below statement from the CCC:
The IRS has confirmed that victims of the PFGBest fraud can access the optional safe harbor mechanism set forth in Revenue Procedure 2009-20 so that victims can claim their losses as theft losses. Responding to the CCC’s request for guidance, the IRS stated in a letter:
…the PFGBest scheme qualifies as a “specified fraudulent arrangement” within the meaning of Revenue Procedure 2009-20. Thus, investors who otherwise meet the requirements of Revenue Procedure 2009-20 may use the safe harbor, following the procedures as set forth in that revenue procedure.
The full response is posted below, along with the documents necessary to utilize this mechanism. Please note: it is not required that PFGBest victims use this procedure. It may not provide the best solution for your particular tax situation. Claimants in the PFGBest case are urged to consult their tax professionals as soon as practicable to determine if it is appropriate and wise to seek relief under the safe harbor deduction for theft losses. You may need to provide the following documents to your tax advisor:
IRS Response to CCC
Revenue Ruling 2009-09: PDF Version
Revenue Procedure 2009-20:PDF Version
CCC Request to IRS CCC Request to IRS
Wasendorf Plea Agreement Wassendorf Plea Agreement
Wassendorf Judgement Wassendorf Judgement
DeCarley Trading
info@decarleytrading.com
1-702-947-0701
www.decarleytrading.comGet our Free Trading Videos, Lessons and eBook today!
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Hugo Chavez Is Gone, But His Oil Legacy Lives On
On March 5, 2013, Hugo Chávez, one of the most iconic presidents in the world, died at the age of 58. While he was alive, Chávez was a highly controversial figure, calling George W. Bush a drunkard and a "psychologically sick man" and Tony Blair an "imperialist pawn who attempts to curry favor with Danger Bush-Hitler."
Like him or hate him, Chávez definitely had a huge following in Venezuela, as well as the entirety of Latin America. His anti-American and socialistic rhetoric made him an ally of Fidel Castro in Cuba and Ahmadinejad in Iran. Combined with Correa in Ecuador, Fernández in Argentina, and Morales in Bolivia, Chávez was able to make a front in South America against the "evil imperialist gringos."
But with him no longer in the picture, things will change, and cheap Venezuelan oil will be able to flow into the markets, right?
Wrong!
Whoever succeeds Hugo Chávez will be trapped between a rock and a hard place. Venezuela currently has some of the cheapest gasoline in the world; it's costing an average of $1 to fill up one's tank. These low prices are made possible by the enormous amount of fuel subsidies – estimated to be 4.5% of the GDP (for reference, the US Department of Defense spends 4.5% of the US GDP). Any attempts to remove these subsidies will be met with enormous resistance from the population, which has long viewed cheap gas as a birthright.
To make things worse, the production of oil from Venezuela has been steadily decreasing due to the lack of reinvesting back into the oil patch and lack of upgrading the energy infrastructure. Instead of investing in the oil sector, Chávez has been spending most of the money on social programs. This decrease in supply combined with increased demand for oil from a growing population means there is much less oil available for exports.
In fact, since Chávez took power in 1999, Venezuela's oil exports have been cut by half. Oil provides 45% of Venezuela's revenue, so in order to keep running the country, the government must find a way to get more money out of every barrel that it exports. And what better way is there than to pass it on to the evil imperialist consumers of the West?
This situation is not happening just in Venezuela, but in many other oil producing countries: Iran, Kuwait, and Indonesia are just a few examples. It is only a matter of time before these countries conspire in order to raise the worldwide price of crude oil. What will they raise it to?
U.S. $100 per barrel of oil? U.S. $150? U.S. $200? Whatever it takes to keep the country running and the ruling classes in power. Will America be spared? According to the latest International Energy Agency (IEA) report, the United States will become self sufficient in energy by 2035, which means that it will be free from the geopolitical manipulations of oil producing countries.
Unfortunately for America, this report is flawed and filled with inconsistencies, relying on it to guide your energy investment decisions would likely prove disastrous to your portfolio. A better bet for your portfolio would be to follow the advice in The 2013 Energy Forecast. It provides an insider's view of two segments of the energy sector likely to provide sizable near term returns to investors who position themselves now.
Just click here to get your free report today!
Get our Free Trading Videos, Lessons and eBook
Like him or hate him, Chávez definitely had a huge following in Venezuela, as well as the entirety of Latin America. His anti-American and socialistic rhetoric made him an ally of Fidel Castro in Cuba and Ahmadinejad in Iran. Combined with Correa in Ecuador, Fernández in Argentina, and Morales in Bolivia, Chávez was able to make a front in South America against the "evil imperialist gringos."
But with him no longer in the picture, things will change, and cheap Venezuelan oil will be able to flow into the markets, right?
Wrong!
Whoever succeeds Hugo Chávez will be trapped between a rock and a hard place. Venezuela currently has some of the cheapest gasoline in the world; it's costing an average of $1 to fill up one's tank. These low prices are made possible by the enormous amount of fuel subsidies – estimated to be 4.5% of the GDP (for reference, the US Department of Defense spends 4.5% of the US GDP). Any attempts to remove these subsidies will be met with enormous resistance from the population, which has long viewed cheap gas as a birthright.
To make things worse, the production of oil from Venezuela has been steadily decreasing due to the lack of reinvesting back into the oil patch and lack of upgrading the energy infrastructure. Instead of investing in the oil sector, Chávez has been spending most of the money on social programs. This decrease in supply combined with increased demand for oil from a growing population means there is much less oil available for exports.
In fact, since Chávez took power in 1999, Venezuela's oil exports have been cut by half. Oil provides 45% of Venezuela's revenue, so in order to keep running the country, the government must find a way to get more money out of every barrel that it exports. And what better way is there than to pass it on to the evil imperialist consumers of the West?
This situation is not happening just in Venezuela, but in many other oil producing countries: Iran, Kuwait, and Indonesia are just a few examples. It is only a matter of time before these countries conspire in order to raise the worldwide price of crude oil. What will they raise it to?
U.S. $100 per barrel of oil? U.S. $150? U.S. $200? Whatever it takes to keep the country running and the ruling classes in power. Will America be spared? According to the latest International Energy Agency (IEA) report, the United States will become self sufficient in energy by 2035, which means that it will be free from the geopolitical manipulations of oil producing countries.
Unfortunately for America, this report is flawed and filled with inconsistencies, relying on it to guide your energy investment decisions would likely prove disastrous to your portfolio. A better bet for your portfolio would be to follow the advice in The 2013 Energy Forecast. It provides an insider's view of two segments of the energy sector likely to provide sizable near term returns to investors who position themselves now.
Just click here to get your free report today!
Get our Free Trading Videos, Lessons and eBook
Friday, March 22, 2013
When it comes to coffee, at this point all that matters is Brazil
Well, the JO crowd finished the week on a positive note. But the bears are still in charge when it comes to coffee. As I have said before, we can pick apart what is going along across the globe but it looks like as Brazil coffee farmers go, so goes coffee futures pricing. Here's today's post on coffee from one of our trading partners Mike Seery......
Coffee futures finished this Friday afternoon on a positive note closing at 136 a pound up 200 points for the trading session finishing higher for the 3rd straight day but still right near 2 ½ year lows as the bear market continues finishing down around 100 points for the trading week.
Coffee futures on the daily chart has excellent chart structure so if you are willing to stick your neck out you will be able to place tight stops limiting your monetary loss in case you are wrong and at this point there is still talk of a tremendous crop coming out of Brazil which is keeping a lid on prices despite the fact of rust problems in Central America a bad drought in Vietnam which is reducing their crop forecast but Brazil’s crop could be so huge as traders are unwilling to stick their neck out on the upside at this point.
As I’ve stated in many previous blogs I was bullish coffee and I was wrong, however the longer we start to grind lower like we are at this point with no volatility going into the volatile frost season I still believe if you have deep enough pockets and you are willing to take a longer term view coffee prices I believe will reward you in the long run because I do believe prices will be higher 12 months from now than they are at these depressed levels.
Even producers in Brazil are starting to complain that prices are getting to low and are starting hold back some of their crop eventually that’s what happens with prices get to low and if prices get too high producers often produce too much sending prices lower but at this point prices are so low that production in my opinion will start to decrease.
Coffee trend? Lower. Chart structure? excellent.
We remain long coffee using ETF "JO"
Click here to get your own free trend analysis for coffee ETF "JO" in your inbox.
Coffee futures finished this Friday afternoon on a positive note closing at 136 a pound up 200 points for the trading session finishing higher for the 3rd straight day but still right near 2 ½ year lows as the bear market continues finishing down around 100 points for the trading week.
Coffee futures on the daily chart has excellent chart structure so if you are willing to stick your neck out you will be able to place tight stops limiting your monetary loss in case you are wrong and at this point there is still talk of a tremendous crop coming out of Brazil which is keeping a lid on prices despite the fact of rust problems in Central America a bad drought in Vietnam which is reducing their crop forecast but Brazil’s crop could be so huge as traders are unwilling to stick their neck out on the upside at this point.
As I’ve stated in many previous blogs I was bullish coffee and I was wrong, however the longer we start to grind lower like we are at this point with no volatility going into the volatile frost season I still believe if you have deep enough pockets and you are willing to take a longer term view coffee prices I believe will reward you in the long run because I do believe prices will be higher 12 months from now than they are at these depressed levels.
Even producers in Brazil are starting to complain that prices are getting to low and are starting hold back some of their crop eventually that’s what happens with prices get to low and if prices get too high producers often produce too much sending prices lower but at this point prices are so low that production in my opinion will start to decrease.
Coffee trend? Lower. Chart structure? excellent.
We remain long coffee using ETF "JO"
Click here to get your own free trend analysis for coffee ETF "JO" in your inbox.
Labels:
Brazil,
bullish,
coffee,
JO,
JVA,
Mike Seery,
vietnam,
volatility
EIA: Pennsylvania Natural Gas Production Rose 69% in 2012 Despite Reduced Drilling Activity
Natural gas production in Pennsylvania averaged 6.1 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in 2012, up from 3.6 Bcf/d in 2011, according to Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) data released in February 2013. This 69% increase came in spite of a significant drop in the number of new natural gas wells started during the year.
Several factors contributed to the production increase. While accelerated drilling in recent years (primarily in the Marcellus Shale formation) significantly boosted Pennsylvania's natural gas production, increases were restricted by the state's limited pipeline and processing infrastructure. This created a large backlog of wells that were drilled but not brought online. As infrastructure expanded, these wells were gradually connected to pipelines, sustaining natural gas production increases through 2012 despite the decline in new natural gas well starts. Data from DEP show that a significant portion of wells that began producing in 2012 were drilled earlier.
Improved drilling and well completion techniques can reduce drilling time and lead to higher production per well. The increased use of horizontal drilling (see graph) and hydraulic fracturing, particularly in the more geologically favorable portions of the Marcellus, allows for more production per well. As operators continue to improve well completion techniques, they are achieving higher initial per-well production rates and boosting overall production.
Pennsylvania typically releases major production data twice a year for unconventional (horizontal) oil and natural gas wells and once a year for conventional oil and natural gas wells. With rapidly increasing natural gas production in Pennsylvania, EIA has proposed to add Pennsylvania (and at least 11 other states) to its monthly EIA-914 natural gas production survey, which would provide more timely reporting of Pennsylvania's rising production.
Test Drive our Trading Service Today
Several factors contributed to the production increase. While accelerated drilling in recent years (primarily in the Marcellus Shale formation) significantly boosted Pennsylvania's natural gas production, increases were restricted by the state's limited pipeline and processing infrastructure. This created a large backlog of wells that were drilled but not brought online. As infrastructure expanded, these wells were gradually connected to pipelines, sustaining natural gas production increases through 2012 despite the decline in new natural gas well starts. Data from DEP show that a significant portion of wells that began producing in 2012 were drilled earlier.
Improved drilling and well completion techniques can reduce drilling time and lead to higher production per well. The increased use of horizontal drilling (see graph) and hydraulic fracturing, particularly in the more geologically favorable portions of the Marcellus, allows for more production per well. As operators continue to improve well completion techniques, they are achieving higher initial per-well production rates and boosting overall production.
Pennsylvania typically releases major production data twice a year for unconventional (horizontal) oil and natural gas wells and once a year for conventional oil and natural gas wells. With rapidly increasing natural gas production in Pennsylvania, EIA has proposed to add Pennsylvania (and at least 11 other states) to its monthly EIA-914 natural gas production survey, which would provide more timely reporting of Pennsylvania's rising production.
Test Drive our Trading Service Today
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Making money with Apple using any size account AAPL
If you missed John Carter's webinar last week you missed how he explained his favorite trade setups. In the last couple of days he has used these exact setups to make himself some killer profits trading Apple [AAPL] options. And the best part about these trades is that they can be profitable with any size account.
Watch John's latest two part video HERE
In this free two part video he explains his EXACT entry signal, and how he managed this trade. It's actually really simple and you've got to see this.
And John is holding another webinar Wednesday night at 8 p.m. eastern, in which he explains his trade setups for trading options in detail. So while you are there make sure to sign up for the webinar before all the slots are taken.
Click here to watch two part video and sign up for webinar
See you Wednesday night!
Ray C. Parrish
The Crude Oil Trader
Watch John's latest two part video HERE
In this free two part video he explains his EXACT entry signal, and how he managed this trade. It's actually really simple and you've got to see this.
And John is holding another webinar Wednesday night at 8 p.m. eastern, in which he explains his trade setups for trading options in detail. So while you are there make sure to sign up for the webinar before all the slots are taken.
Click here to watch two part video and sign up for webinar
See you Wednesday night!
Ray C. Parrish
The Crude Oil Trader
Labels:
AAPL,
Apple,
crude oil trader,
John Carter,
options,
webinar
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Trading Tips from John D. Rockefeller
John D. Rockefeller was America's first billionaire. After the civil war Rockefeller had a good amount of money with which to invest. He (correctly) believed railroads would become the primary means to transport agricultural products and would open up the vast western lands to eastern markets, trends that didn't bode well for his own produce shipping. He began to look for other business ventures that could be profitable and found a fledgling sector poised to take off.....the oil industry.
However, where he and his partners entered was not in oil production, but its refining. The same railroads that would eclipse his shipping business would help launch his refining venture, as Cleveland enjoyed not the usual one rail line, but two. Transportation costs would be lower and thus his refinery products more competitive.
By the late 1860s, only five years after getting into the oil business, Rockefeller's refining company was the largest in the world. A major reason for his success was a business model that today we call vertical integration. Rockefeller knew that in order to keep costs down, he would have to control both the upstream and the downstream. For example, he even bought his own woodlands for lumber to make his own oil barrels, and built kilns on site to dry the lumber and save shipping weight on its way to (his own) cooperage. His attention to cost cutting was painstaking.
So, can we learn from Rockefeller and put the lessons he learned to work for us in our modern day trading?
Let's try.
Trading like Rockefeller.....
1. Lower your costs. Lower costs mean higher margins and much more resilience during bad times. Rockefeller famously reduced from 40 to 39 the number of drops of solder to close the lids of kerosene cans, saving the company hundreds of thousands of dollars in the long run. He'd also ask for financial statements down to three decimal places, the better to spot inefficiencies in his supply chain and fix them.As investors, follow in Rockefeller's footsteps by investing in companies with low costs, but also reduce the cost basis in the stocks you own.
2. Have you checked lately whether you're getting the best deal from your brokerage? Don't be afraid to take your business somewhere else. Every advantage counts in this fast moving world.
3. Also, are you making the most out of your portfolio? Could you do more with it? It's a good idea to invest a portion (and we do mean just a portion) of your portfolio in equities that can offer higher reward for higher risk. This is especially true if your portfolio is heavy in capital.
4. When the market is turning against you, move on. Had Rockefeller stuck to his grain shipping business, he'd likely not even made a ripple on the pages of financial history. When he spotted opportunity in the up and coming oil industry, he wasn't afraid to abandon what had been a good thing and to take the leap.For us, this advice means sometimes selling companies that are under performing. Knowing when it's time to cut our losses and to turn our capital toward more profitable ventures. The tricky part is knowing when to be patient and hold and when to recognize a true shift in the marketplace....and that comes from reading the signs from Mr. Market.
5. Vertical integration is a hallmark among many strong companies. Part of the reason Rockefeller could edge out his competitors was the fact that he controlled his own supply chain. He noticed very early on that if he did not control many aspects of his production, he would be at a disadvantage when it came to negotiations. And as he expanded his business, he purchased companies that could make the entire refinery process smoother, including pipelines, railroads, and even those woodlands we mentioned.Thus, if we want blue chip companies that will perform well for us over the long term, we should look for firms that are vertically integrated within their own sectors.
6. Patience is key. Rockefeller kept his discipline when he landed in a tough job market after school. As investors, we're looking for companies that can pay good dividends in the long run. However, we must be wary of overpaying for stocks. Being patient, letting the market come to us rather than chase it ourselves, will give us the best bang for our buck.
Check out our Top 50 Stocks List
However, where he and his partners entered was not in oil production, but its refining. The same railroads that would eclipse his shipping business would help launch his refining venture, as Cleveland enjoyed not the usual one rail line, but two. Transportation costs would be lower and thus his refinery products more competitive.
By the late 1860s, only five years after getting into the oil business, Rockefeller's refining company was the largest in the world. A major reason for his success was a business model that today we call vertical integration. Rockefeller knew that in order to keep costs down, he would have to control both the upstream and the downstream. For example, he even bought his own woodlands for lumber to make his own oil barrels, and built kilns on site to dry the lumber and save shipping weight on its way to (his own) cooperage. His attention to cost cutting was painstaking.
So, can we learn from Rockefeller and put the lessons he learned to work for us in our modern day trading?
Let's try.
Trading like Rockefeller.....
1. Lower your costs. Lower costs mean higher margins and much more resilience during bad times. Rockefeller famously reduced from 40 to 39 the number of drops of solder to close the lids of kerosene cans, saving the company hundreds of thousands of dollars in the long run. He'd also ask for financial statements down to three decimal places, the better to spot inefficiencies in his supply chain and fix them.As investors, follow in Rockefeller's footsteps by investing in companies with low costs, but also reduce the cost basis in the stocks you own.
2. Have you checked lately whether you're getting the best deal from your brokerage? Don't be afraid to take your business somewhere else. Every advantage counts in this fast moving world.
3. Also, are you making the most out of your portfolio? Could you do more with it? It's a good idea to invest a portion (and we do mean just a portion) of your portfolio in equities that can offer higher reward for higher risk. This is especially true if your portfolio is heavy in capital.
4. When the market is turning against you, move on. Had Rockefeller stuck to his grain shipping business, he'd likely not even made a ripple on the pages of financial history. When he spotted opportunity in the up and coming oil industry, he wasn't afraid to abandon what had been a good thing and to take the leap.For us, this advice means sometimes selling companies that are under performing. Knowing when it's time to cut our losses and to turn our capital toward more profitable ventures. The tricky part is knowing when to be patient and hold and when to recognize a true shift in the marketplace....and that comes from reading the signs from Mr. Market.
5. Vertical integration is a hallmark among many strong companies. Part of the reason Rockefeller could edge out his competitors was the fact that he controlled his own supply chain. He noticed very early on that if he did not control many aspects of his production, he would be at a disadvantage when it came to negotiations. And as he expanded his business, he purchased companies that could make the entire refinery process smoother, including pipelines, railroads, and even those woodlands we mentioned.Thus, if we want blue chip companies that will perform well for us over the long term, we should look for firms that are vertically integrated within their own sectors.
6. Patience is key. Rockefeller kept his discipline when he landed in a tough job market after school. As investors, we're looking for companies that can pay good dividends in the long run. However, we must be wary of overpaying for stocks. Being patient, letting the market come to us rather than chase it ourselves, will give us the best bang for our buck.
Check out our Top 50 Stocks List
Labels:
equities,
Industry,
oil business,
portfolio,
railroads,
refinery,
refining,
Rockefeller
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)